Turkay’s et al. article attempts to bridge the gap between the researchers and policy makers relating to the role and possibility of implementing video games in classroom settings. The article provides research-based areas of awareness and a discussion of factors that can facilitate understanding related to choosing and using video games. To do so, the authors show how educational games can be conceived by different theoretical perspectives on learning and discuss several essential design issues that educators should take into account when considering a video game for educational use. Finally, the authors provide a list of several concerns relating to implementing video games in the classrooms.
The authors state that cognitive, social, and cultural aspects of learning interact with each other, and recognizing how video games align to these learning theories is crucial to understand their potential as vehicles of learning. The article also touches upon the crucial component of video games, feedback. The authors provide pros and cons, as well as different strategies of providing feedback such as instant, visual, and auditory feedback. Furthermore, the students’ choices of video games and platforms are briefly discussed. Finally, the article shows in table some questions to consider when integrating games into instruction. Such these question are:
1. What is my instructional goal and how well does the game being considered match?
2. Does the game match my instructional philosophy and incorporate learning theories consistent with my goals?
3. Does the game match my instructional philosophy regarding appropriate feedback?
4. Does the game match my instructional philosophy regarding the availability of learner choice?
5. Does the interface match my instructional context?
Reference
Turkay, S., Hoffman, D., Kinzer, C. K., Chantes, P., & Vicari, C. (2014). Toward understanding the potential of games for learning: learning theory, game design characteristics, and situating video games in classrooms. Computers in the Schools, 31(1-2), 2-22.